Search results for "Mental operations"

showing 4 items of 4 documents

Integrating the Analysis of Mental Operations Into Multilevel Models to Validate an Assessment of Higher Education Students’ Competency in Business a…

2016

The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing indicate that validation of assessments should include analyses of participants’ response processes. However, such analyses typically are conducted only to supplement quantitative field studies with qualitative data, and seldom are such data connected to quantitative data on student or item performance. This paper presents an example of how data from an analysis of mental operations collected using a sociocognitive approach can be quantitatively integrated with other data on student and item performance to validate in part an assessment of higher education students’ competency in business and economics. Evidence of forward reasoning an…

Higher educationManagement sciencebusiness.industry05 social sciencesMultilevel modelApplied psychology050401 social sciences methods050301 educationProtocol analysisQualitative propertyTest validityMental operationsEducation0504 sociologyCredibilityDevelopmental and Educational PsychologyPsychology (miscellaneous)PsychologyStandards for Educational and Psychological Testingbusiness0503 educationApplied PsychologyJournal of Educational Measurement
researchProduct

Contributions of Response Processes Analysis to the Validation of an Assessment of Higher Education Students’ Competence in Business and Economics

2017

Higher education domains such as Business and Economics (B&E) generally lack evidence that standardized tests of competency actually assess those aspects of knowledge and reasoning that constitute important targets for learning and instruction. The construction of such a validity argument benefits from a framework to guide the collection of relevant evidence regarding the interpretive meaning of tests results, especially with respect to instruction and learning in B&E. Response processes analysis provides much needed evidence within such a validity argument. The present paper illustrates application of such a framework and the use of response processes analysis for assessment in the B&E hig…

Higher educationbusiness.industryManagement sciencePolitical scienceEconomics educationMathematics educationRelevance (law)Standardized testCognitionHeuristicsbusinessCompetence (human resources)Mental operations
researchProduct

An active inference and epistemic value view of metacognition

2015

Metacognition concerns our monitoring and control of mental operations (knowing what you know). Much thinking about metacognition is liable to fall foul of the classic homunculus problem: Nobody can specify who or what does the "metacognition." We describe how the Active Inference and Epistemic Value (AIEV) model offers an operationalization of epistemic behaviors which can explain two example metacognitive phenomena: Control and monitoring of word learning, and the search for unretrieved information in the feeling of knowing. Curiosity drives a search forward, but it is held in check by considering the utility of what is retrieved from memory.

Value (ethics)Cognitive Neurosciencemedia_common.quotation_subjectMetacognitionInferencenobody050105 experimental psychologyMental operations[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences03 medical and health sciences[SCCO]Cognitive science0302 clinical medicine[ SHS ] Humanities and Social Sciences0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUSmedia_commonCognitive scienceOperationalization05 social sciences16. Peace & justiceEpistemologyFeelingCuriosity[ SCCO ] Cognitive sciencePsychology030217 neurology & neurosurgeryCognitive psychology
researchProduct

Self in NARS, an AGI System

2018

This article describes and discusses the self-related mechanisms of a general-purpose intelligent system, NARS. This system is designed to be adaptive and to work with insufficient knowledge and resources. The system’s various cognitive functions are uniformly carried out by a central reasoning-learning process following a “non-axiomatic” logic. This logic captures the regularities of human empirical reasoning, where all beliefs are revisable according to evidence, and the meaning of concepts are grounded in the system’s experience. NARS perceives its internal environment basically in the same way as how it perceives its external environment although the sensors involved are completely diff…

general intelligence0209 industrial biotechnologyself-controlComputer scienceProcess (engineering)lcsh:Mechanical engineering and machineryControl (management)02 engineering and technologyconsciousnessConstructiveMental operationslcsh:QA75.5-76.9503 medical and health sciences020901 industrial engineering & automation0302 clinical medicineHuman–computer interactionArtificial Intelligencelcsh:TJ1-1570Meaning (existential)Original ResearchRobotics and AISelf-organizationnon-axiomatic logicCognitionself-organizationComputer Science ApplicationsSelf-awarenesslcsh:Electronic computers. Computer scienceself-awareness030217 neurology & neurosurgeryFrontiers in Robotics and AI
researchProduct